British / Maritime Law vs American / Common Law!

This is VERY important to know...

Anyone who practices law in America with a BAR license is supporting British / Maritime Law, and not American / Common Law!

When you walk into a court room, and speak or testify, or sign any document, you are representing your fictional strawman, JOHN DOE and not your living, breathing flesh and blood, John Doe.

Free men and a free women do not go to the bar, which is "Court" only strawmen get presented there.

All judges are "attorney's" also.

The attorney is ATTORNING a free man or womans rights. His job is to get you to confess you are a strawman. To be able to sell you and represent the strawman, RE-PRESENT.

---

ATTORNING...

Or...

ATTORNMENT

In feudal and old English law. A turning over or transfer by a lord of the services of his tenant to the grantee of his seigniory. Attornment is the act of a person who holds a leasehold interest in land, or estate for life or years, by which he agrees to become the tenant of a stranger who has acquired the fee in the land, or the remainder or reversion, or the right to the rent or services by which the tenant holds. Lindley v. Dakiu, 13 Ind. 388; Willis v. Moore, 59 Tex. 630, 40 Am. Rep. 2S4; Foster v. Morris, 3 A. K. Marsh. (Ky.) 610, 13 Am. Dec. 205.

In feudal and old English law, attornment was a significant legal concept involving the transfer of services from a tenant to a new grantee of his or her seigniory, which was typically the lord or superior landowner. The act of attornment played a crucial role when a person held a leasehold interest in land, an estate for life, or a term of years. In such cases, the tenant would agree to become the tenant of a stranger who had acquired the fee in the land, the remainder or reversion, or the right to the rent or services by which the tenant originally held the property.

The process of attornment was integral to the feudal system, which governed land ownership and tenancy relationships during medieval times. Under this system, land was owned by a lord, and in return for the right to use the land, the tenant would provide various services, such as agricultural labor or military support. These obligations were known as "services," and they formed the foundation of the lord-tenant relationship.

When a lord transferred his seigniory, or the rights to the land, to another person, the tenant was required to acknowledge this transfer formally. This acknowledgment, where the tenant accepted the new lord as the rightful owner of the land, was referred to as "attornment." Essentially, the tenant was agreeing to shift their loyalty and obligations from the original lord to the new grantee.

The act of attornment was crucial for both the new landowner and the tenant. For the new grantee, it solidified their legal right to the land and ensured that the tenant would recognize their authority and continue to provide the established services. On the other hand, for the tenant, attornment was necessary to safeguard their rights and ensure that they would be protected from any claims made by a third party against their tenure.

Attornment was not limited to cases where the new grantee was an individual. It could also occur when the rights to the land or services were assigned to an institution, such as a church or monastery. In such instances, religious institutions often became important landlords, and the tenants would attorn to the ecclesiastical authorities as their new lords.

Several legal cases from different jurisdictions illustrate the importance and prevalence of attornment in feudal and old English law. For instance, in the case of Lindley v. Dakiu, the concept of attornment was analyzed within the context of tenant-landlord relationships, emphasizing its significance in determining rightful ownership of the land. Similarly, cases like Willis v. Moore and Foster v. Morris showcased how attornment played a vital role in protecting tenants' interests and ensuring a smooth transition of land ownership.

Over time, as legal systems evolved and feudalism waned, the practice of attornment became less prominent. Modern property laws and tenancy practices shifted away from the complex feudal arrangements, favoring more straightforward and direct methods of transferring land ownership and tenancy rights. However, despite its decline, the historical significance of attornment persists, serving as a valuable reminder of the intricate legal relationships that once governed land ownership and tenancy in feudal and old English law.

---

ATTORN

In feudal law. To transfer or turn over to another. Where a lord aliened his seigniory, he might with the consent of the tenant, and in some cases without attorn or transfer the homage and service of the latter to the alienee or new lord. Bract, fols. 816, 82. In modern law. To consent to the transfer of a rent or reversion. A tenant is said to attorn when he agrees to become the tenant of the person to whom the reversion has been granted. See ATTORNMENT.

British / Maritime Law deals only with your strawman JOHN DOE. (Every since 1871, all American courts & judges are running under the jurisdiction of Maritime Law.)

American / Common Law deals only with your living, breathing flesh and blood, John Doe.

-

NOTE: If you are not a member of American Patriot Social and would like to join, please visit the link below.

https://AmericanPatriotSocial.com/1350/

07/30/2023
2