A BRIEF HISTORY OF THE UNITED STATES - PART 6
BRITISH SUBVERSION, BANKS, AND TREASON
Even though the Treaty of Paris allegedly ended the open Revolutionary War in 1783, it did not covertly stop the Crown and their Money Kings from subverting the newly found political structure by whatever means possible. Simply put, the fact of the continuing existence of the social compact as it was designed threatened the Monarchies and Money Kings where it hurt most: financially, by a collective of Sovereign People by and through their State body corporate governments and central agency government. It effectively severed the nexus third party attachment, if properly attended with respect to the Sovereign People behind the Veil of the Corporation so established. But, where in history have any people kept eternal vigilance, either of themselves or for their posterity or their posterity when times are easy, after the sacrifice and success of their forefathers? The Sovereign People (forefathers of the social compact) had paid close attention to how the Crown and Money Kings had used corporations to plunder the people and hidden itself behind this veil to limit the Money Kings' and Crown's liability arising via tort. This was because of the Money Kings and Crowns avarice desire to rule all walks of life, whether such people fell within the moral jurisdiction of the Crowns or not. The forefathers who created the social compact known as "The United States of America" in turn reversed the use of corporations to protect themselves and their posterity from the Crown to their benefit. The so called United States stood as a heroic role model for a short time, for other weaker social compacts around the planet, which inspired them to also struggle against oppressive Money Kings and Monarchies, etc. The French Revolution (1789-1799) and the Polish Uprising (1794) were, in part, encouraged by the so-called American Revolution. Locally speaking, we the people stood like a beacon of hope for most of the world. The Money Kings and Monarchies regarded the so-called United States as a political infection, the principle source of radical republican democracy that was destroying the Money Kings and Monarchies (more importantly the Money Kings, the power behind the Crowns) around the world. The Money Kings and Monarchies realized that if the principle source of that infection could be destroyed, the rest of the world might avoid the contagion and the Monarchies would be saved.
Knowing they couldn't destroy us militarily, they resorted to more covert methods of political and financial subversion, employing spies and secret agents (Attorneys) skilled in bribery and legal deception. This was perhaps the first "cold war." In the 1794 Jay Treaty, the United States agreed to pay £600,000 sterling to King George III, as reparations for the so-called American Revolution which came about not from any one people of the so-called Americas damaging the Crown, but because the Crown and Money Kings had sought to invade the private lives of all walks of life without real representation. The US Senate ratified the treaty in secret session and ordered that it not be published. When Benjamin Franklin' s grandson published it anyway (perhaps our first whistleblower), the exposure and resulting public up-roar so angered the Congress that it passed the Alien and Sedition Acts (1798) so that federal judges could prosecute editors and publishers for reporting the truth about the government. So much for the so-called people' s rights of freedom of speech who were not signatory to the social compact. And who are these people who claim a right under a contract to which they themselves were not signatory? Are they related to the actual signatories by blood, as one of their posterity to which the contractual nexus could possibly extend to state a Claim of Action concerning such speech from which such posterity of the signatories could be granted relief? No. Not ONE of them had any true credibility, especially concerning any member of the State Compact Party States of the Union (Marriage) of the Several States. That would be like someone coming to your bed and claiming a right of prima noctae (the right of first night-the right of the nobleman of ancient times in England, and various other jurisdictions, to take to themselves the brides within their domain during the first night after the wedding of the peasants for their own pleasure and to be returned the following day after the young bride had been deflowered by the nobleman). Not something that we would likely stand for now, is it?! So, how is it one can presume to claim a right under a social compact, i. e., Constitution, to which you are not signatory to, nor related in some form or another as their posterity, to be able to state a claim for which relief could possibly be granted by any provable underlying contractual nexus for their agents to be able to recognize a liability on their part to perform in some fiduciary manner, on your behalf, for any assumed breach of contract concerning any alleged claim of right arising thereunder, as stated or claimed by you, in a forum to which, for all intents and purposes, is foreign to you and looked upon in the same manner by such a one, relative to you and your standing, to state a claim for which relief can be granted in such forum. Unless you can prove a contractual nexus, you're "burnt toast," an alien in their regard, with no possible expectation that you would be viewed otherwise or have any inherent right to protection or benevolence.
Since they supposedly had won the Revolutionary War, why would their Senators agree to pay reparations to the loser? Why would they agree to pay £600,000 sterling, eleven years after the war ended? It doesn't make sense, especially in light of the Senate's secrecy and later fury over being exposed . . . unless we assume their Senators (Attorneys) had been bribed (or were already in the service thereof) to serve the Money Kings and British monarchy to betray the so-called American people! That is treason only in regards to the intents and purposes of the original creators of the social compact and the then and after living posterity thereof!
From the beginning, the United States Bank had been opposed by the Democratic-Republicans lead by Thomas Jefferson, but the Federalists (the pro-monarchy party) won the vote (1796). The initial capitalization was $10,000,000 -- 80% of which would be owned by foreign bankers. Since the bank was authorized to lend up to $20,000,000 (double its paid capital), it was a profitable deal for both government and the bankers, since they could lend and collect interest on $10,000,000 that did not exist.
However, the European bankers outfoxed the agency U.S. government. By 1796, the agency U.S. government owed the bank $6,200,000 and was forced to sell most of its shares. By 1802, our government owned no stock in the United States Bank!
Thomas Jefferson had warned (1802) :
"If the American people ever allow private banks to control the issue of their currency, first by inflation, then by deflation, the banks... will deprive the people of all property until their children wake-up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered.... The issuing power should be taken from the banks and restored to the people, to whom it properly belongs."
BANK FRAUD, BRIBERY, AND CORRUPTION
Chief among the international financiers was Amshe1 Bauer of Germany who, in 1748 opened a goldsmith shop under the name of Red Shield. (In German, the name is spelled Rothschild and is pronounced Rote-shilld). In 1787, Amshel (Bauer) Rothschild made the famous statement:
"Let me issue and control a Nation's money, and I care not who writes the laws. " He had five Sons Amshel Mayer, Solomon, Jacob, Nathan, and Carl. In 1798, the five Rothschild brothers expanded by opening banks in Germany, Vienna, Paris, London, and Naples.
The objective behind these bankers was to establish a clearinghouse/warehouse (bank) which was to receive special privilege and immunity to use the unjust fractional reserve banking in order to print money and loan it to the agency government and corporate industry charter via the corporate agency government. No beneficial interest could accrue from any beneficial use from any circulation of any note generated via the charter. This was established by the agency United States for the purpose of servicing the debt of the corporate United States and for the purpose of transferring the liability of the accrued debt, which had never been extinguished since the 1770's, forward without interest being paid to the (fiscal agents of the Crown) bankers. Through these schemes, the corporate agency government contrived to pass the liability through adhesion contracts to other walks of life under various new deals to discharge thereon debts to the Crown.
One of the very simple schemes foisted upon the people at large was fractional reserve banking. It is simply a special privilege given to a man or group of men to create credit out of thin air. The schemes are executed by extending this credit/debt to any and everyone else in or found about a loosely associated people closely associated with a particular society or social compact. By, and through, such misrepresentations perpetrated upon such Walks of Life. which do not have the same access to the same privileges or immunities that the creator of the social compact or their posterity have, and thereby are burdened with paying the collecting fees from servicing the alleged debt of the social compact, the assumed value of money and the attached-plus interest - for the cost of the use of the units created to discharge in tender of debt thereof. Due to the beneficial interest created by the use of such instruments created by fractional reserve banking, the Crown and Money Kings become very rich and the agency government is allowed to continue to legally discharge its debt and service their liability without having to produce anything of value other than to 'attorn' such property (by and through such Attorneys of the Crown) from the unaware populous not familiar with the principals of discharge, contractually speaking, which is only a viable option to those which exercise credibility to expatriate from such assumed nexus with such social compact and its liability and repatriate according to the principals of International Public Order into such society to which they become a creative signatory member thereof to such social compact, thereby creating a nexus for their safety, liberty, and pursuit of happiness by creating a hereditary birthright and standing to which their posterity may acquire by birth as well.
The basic mathematics behind the fractional banking system is very clear. If this system is left in place long enough, the man or group who controls this system of debt creation will own all the gold available in the social compact however known as a nation/state, kingdom or otherwise. Once the supply of real portable specie money (gold/silver or whatever the medium of exchange, whether money of account or money of exchange (species) is in his or their hands, this man or group of men becomes the master of the entire economic field of endeavor of such social compact. Why? Because this man or group of men controls the only source of operating medium (money, however defined) available through which the social compact functions to discharge debt. Only the man who has the privilege of printing and/or minting the money and loaning or extending such as interest can determine who gets special (drawing rights) funding-his friends and allies. Everyone else is limited to how much money (of account or exchange) they have access to; therefore, after two or three generations, the friends and allies of this "banker" will own all of the energy of such social compact. This present condition is being played out in the so-called American society and is now owned by a small cadre of very wealthy men throughout the planet. This same scheme of fractional reserve manipulation is being played out, throughout all of the various political social constructs globally with ONE aim, world domination of each and every resource to which the Planet Earth can produce for their selfish benefit, including the absolute control of each and every living soul upon the planet to be forced economically into serving solely the private interests and gain of the Money Kings.
How long the fractional banking process takes to work its way through the wealth of any social compact depends upon how successful the "banker" is in forcing, through bribery and corruption, the restriction of the formal agency government's issuance of real money backed by gold or silver or such other medium of account or exchange. Species currency is put into circulation to honestly and truly pay debt or discharge whatever liability is acquired which may or may not arise when one increases one's E'State through the benefit of their efforts and labor as most people evidentially wished to. Was this not the American Dream? Furthermore, as the supply of real money shrinks, the people of any social compact are forced to rely on the creation of a fictitious debt by the privileged few to a greater and greater extent, until finally, the only thing left is a massive amount of "un-payable debt," with no way to lawfully discharge their acquired debt, which was created from nothing and consists only of the interest charged upon the fictitious debt, while collecting interest for every moment of its existence. All this for the benefit of the privileged, who become the de facto (illegally usurped) agency government because of the "money power" they allow to be wielded by and through the social compact. Few are ever aware of the true damages done to their E'States or that of such E'State to which may or may not be possible to pass by hereditary right so-to-speak and the debt which if not lawfully discharged back to the Original source or Creator of the debt, passes on to future generations of their posterity, creating a continuous debtor class people (subjects now of the Money Kings) to the whims of a foreign despotic tyrannical power.
THE FIRST NATIONAL BANK
Through the Bank of England, the Rothschilds/the Money Kings demanded (did you ever wonder how they could make such a demand of the Crown) a private bank in the so-called United States to hold the securities of the United States as the pledged assets to the Crown of England in order to secure the debt to which the signatories of the social compact by and through their agency government had defaulted. As one of his first acts, President Washington declared a financial emergency. William Morris with the help of Alexander Hamilton, Secretary of Treasury, heavily promoted the creation of a private banker' s clearinghouse (customhouse) to service the debt to the international bankers. In 1791 , Congress chartered the first national bank (banker' s clearinghouse) for a term of 20 years, to hold the securities of the same European bankers who had been holding the debts before the war. The bankers loaned worthless, un-backed, non-secured printed money of account to each other to charter this first bank. On December 12, 1791, the Bank of the United States opened its doors in Philadelphia. The holders of the securities were the private bankers. So under Public International Law, the Creditor (Crown of England) forced the so-called United States to establish a private banker' s clearinghouse (warehouse) to hold the securities as the collateral for the (social compact) so called national debt.
James Madison had warned:
"History records that the money changers have used every form of abuse, intrigue, deceit, and violent means possible to maintain their control over governments by controlling money and its issuance."
BRITISH SUBVERSION, TITLES OF NOBILITY & TREASON
From the early decades of U.S . history, relations between the United States and Great Britain remained strained. Their relationship deteriorated sharply with the outbreak of war in Europe in 1803 . Britain imposed a blockade on neutral (social compact) countries such as the United States. In addition, the British took people acting under an agency status as American sailors from their ships and forced them to serve in the British Navy. Concerned about the many English spies and troublemakers, the United States in Congress Assembled, passed an amendment to prevent those who had English titles and connections from obtaining any seat in government. Called the Titles of Nobility Act (TONA, 1810-11), it reads as follows:
"If any citizen of the United States shall accept, claim, receive, or retain any title of nobility or honor, or shall without the consent of Congress, accept and retain any present, pension, office, or emolument of any kind whatever, from any emperor, king, prince, or foreign power, such person shall cease to be a citizen of the United States, and shall be incapable of holding any office of trust or profit under them, or either of them."
This congressional act (TONA) was later to amend the U.S. Constitution as the Original XIII Amendment, which led to the War of 1812 with Great Britain. Furthermore, it took the Civil War to officially force the gradual replacement of this amendment to be taken from all reference from every state published record with what is now known as the Slavery Amendment or the Amendment created as an act against Involuntary Servitude (1863), a War-time Act passed under Martial Law.
All "titles of nobility" were prohibited in both Article VI of the Articles of Confederation of "The United States of America" (1777) and in Article I, Section 9 of the Constitution for the "United States" (1778), but there was no penalty. Although already prohibited by the Constitution, an additional "title of nobility" amendment was deemed necessary and was proposed in 1789, again in 1810, and finally ratified in 1819. But the notice of ratification delivered to the Secretary of State, an attorney with the title, "Esquire," disappeared. As a result, there still is no penalty for accepting titles or emoluments from foreign rulers today, just the prohibition.
Clearly, the founding fathers saw such a serious threat in "titles of nobility" and "honors," that anyone receiving them would be required to forfeit their citizenship. Obviously the Amendment carried much more significance for their founding fathers than is readily apparent today. The forefathers knew that their freedom and that of their posterity could be subverted from inside their agency government and had sought to prevent such a bitter betrayal. Today, most Senators, Congressmen, all Federal Judges, and most of their Presidents are attorneys who carry the title "Esquire," often abbreviated as "Esq." Nevertheless, the U.S. Constitution still forbids this.
In Colonial America, attorneys trained attorneys, but most held no "title of nobility" or "honor. " There was no requirement that one be a lawyer to hold the position of district attorney, attorney general, or judge; a citizen's "counsel of choice" was not restricted to a lawyer and there was no state or national bar associations. The only organization that certified lawyers was the International Bar Association (IBA), chartered by the King of England (known as the British Accreditation Registry), headquartered in London and recognized everywhere as the BAR. Lawyers admitted to the IBA, or otherwise BAR, as it is most readily known everywhere, receive the rank "Esquire" - a " title of British nobility."
"Esquire" was the principle title of nobility which the 13th Amendment sought to prohibit from exercising any office within the United States. Why? Because the loyalty of "Esquire" lawyers was suspect ! Lawyers with an "Esquire" behind their names were agents of the Money Changers and the Monarchy, and members of an organization whose principle purposes were political and regarded with the same wariness that some people today reserve for members of the KGB or the CIA.
The archaic definition of "honor" (as used when the 13th Amendment was ratified) meant anyone " obtaining or having an advantage or privilege over another. " A contemporary example of an "honor" granted to only a few Americans is the privilege of being a judge: lawyers can be judges and exercise the attendant privileges and powers, non-lawyers generally cannot. We address the judge as, "your Honor."
By prohibiting "honors," the missing, but now found, original 13th amendment prohibits any advantage or privilege that would grant some citizens an equal opportunity to achieve or exercise political power. Therefore, the second meaning (intent) of the original 1 3th Amendment was to ensure political equality among all citizens of the United States, by prohibiting anyone, even government officials, from claiming or exercising a special privilege or power (an "honor ") over other citizens. Now, what would happen if this amendment were enforced? It would cause an immediate chaos in all three branches of the agency federal government and the same in each and every State of the Union because these same Attorneys sit in every seat of power throughout every level of the social compact for the sole purpose of enforcing the mandates of the Money Kings and the Crown of England, even upon those people to whom the alleged original debt was incurred by, that has absolutely nothing to do with either said people or through any nexus of the social compact to which their forefathers had accepted the liability of such debt in the 1770s, nor does any people not signatory or evidencing any hereditary privileges as their posterity incur any liability for such debt by any stretch of the imaginings of such perfidious Attorneys who practice their pedifoggery upon all walks of life by and through such frauds perpetrated upon them by these leeches of the ancient Money Changers living upon the economic well-being of any and all societies known as Attorneys.
Both "esquire" and "honor" would be key targets of the 13th Amendment even today. Because, while "titles of nobility" no longer apply now precisely as they did back in the early 1800's, it is clear that an "esquire" or BAR attorney receives far better treatment than a layman, in and by their courts, as well as by the public at large, in general. Whereas, if you represent yourself pro per, in se, or speak as a Sovereign in proprius personam, you are treated as though you were rabble. Your opinions are of little importance in their courts and you are more than often treated similarly by such agency government officials. Because you are not an " esquires" or BAR attorney, you are considered to be a useless eater, a subject "out of control." The concept of "honor" remains relevant, possibly more so today than at any previous time in U.S. history, for they, the "honors," are greatly feared and even revered, even by their esquires who are considered to be below them. Since the Original 13th Amendment has never been repealed, all acts of their government since 1819 are technically null and void. Most so-called lawmakers, are attorneys and are prohibited from participation in any office of government by the true amended social compact contract known as U.S . Constitution. Thereby, every attorney should be stripped of his or her appearance of right to hold any office as an agent representing any so-called citizen of the United States under TONA aforementioned, who have continued to interject themselves into the political process solely for their benefit of gainful pillaging and plunder.
When people discovered that European banking interests owned most of the United States B ank where they deposited their hard earned savings, they saw the sheer power of the banks and their ability to influence representative government by economic manipulation and outright bribery. On February 20, 1811, Congress therefore refused to renew the Banker's charter on the grounds that the Bank was unconstitutional. This led to the withdrawal of $7,000,000 in specie (money in coin) by European investors, which in tum, precipitated an economic recession, and the War of 1812. This "war" was punishment for the United States in Congress Assembled, refusing under the pressure of people becoming aware of this manipulation, to do business on the terms of the International Banking families of the House of Rothschild, through the first Bank of the United States. Congress refused to let the National Bank renew its Charter, fearing for their safety.
Except for Gen. Andrew Jackson's victory in the Battle of New Orleans, the War of 1812 produced a string of American military disasters. The most shocking of these was the British Army's burning of the Capitol, the President's house, the Library of Congress and other public buildings in Washington on August 24 and 25, 1814. (Americans had previously burned public buildings in Canada.) During the War of 1812, so-called national archives of the United States and many libraries and document repositories were burned and some of the evidence of the TONA previously mentioned disappeared. Nevertheless, the legislature of Virginia ratified the amendment and it was subsequently printed in many official publications as the 13th Amendment, even in States which had NOT ratified, such as Connecticut and several States that came into the Union later in history. Beginning in 1832, it began to disappear from texts, although official state publications continued to publish it as late as 1876.
There are undoubtedly other examples of the Money King's and the Monarchy's efforts to subvert or destroy the so-called social compact known as the United States. Some are common knowledge, while others remain to be disclosed to the public. For example, national archivist David Dodge discovered a book called 2 VA LAW in the Library of Congress Law Library. According to Dodge, "This is an un-catalogued book in the rare book section that reveals a plan to overthrow the Constitutional government by secret agreements engineered by the lawyers of the time. "That is one of the reasons why the TONA was ratified by the state of Virginia in the particular manner in which they did, although the alleged "notification" thereof was a long time thereafter claimed to have been "lost in the mail." You see, there is no public record that this aforementioned book exists either!
That may sound surprising, but according to The Gazette (5/10/91 ), " The Library of Congress has 349,402 un-catalogued rare books and 13.9 million un-catalogued rare manuscripts." There may be secrets buried in that mass of documents even more astonishing than a missing Constitutional Amendment. Yet this image of documentary disarray appropriately describes our situation today: we are inundated with useless information while we are misdirected from information that we have not had the time or interest to sort through. As a result we have lost a precious treasure in the chaos and turmoil of daily life: our sovereignty.
One amazing aspect of the War of 1812 was the existence of a depression during wartime. War always brings a short-term prosperity, except in the case of this war. To understand this, it is vital for you to know that all depressions and recessions are artificially created through the restriction of a medium of accounting or exchange-money. This restriction keeps so-called money OUT of circulation, which means fewer funds available to facilitate production and distribution. Furthermore, this means poverty and starvation for all walks of life not privy to such plunder.
The precariousness of agency government finance during the war and the post war recession convinced the Republican agency government under James Madison to re-establish a so-called national bank. Thus was created the Second Bank of the United States in 1816.
Click Here To View PDF Version
-
Learn About The "Matrix" Tom Althouse – Creator of “The Immortals” (aka “The Matrix”)
http://americanpatriotsocial.com/video1/tag/tom-althouse-interviews-creator-of-the-matrix/
-
View All: https://americanpatriotsocial.com/strawman/the-strawman-redemption-process.html
-
NOTE: If you would like to comment or join the active discussion on this post please visit the link below to join 1350 group on American Patriot Social.