When we delve into the foundations of our governance, it becomes apparent that the framers of state constitutions recognized the inherent sovereignty of the people. These documents affirm that Americans are not mere subjects under a ruling authority but rather the ultimate sovereigns within their respective states. This distinction is critical, as it frames the relationship between the government and the governed. By acknowledging that the people have the right and obligation to intervene when their government fails to uphold its duties, we empower ourselves to enact meaningful changes. This concept not only reinforces our role in society but emphasizes the importance of civic engagement and responsibility. It is through this lens that we must view our responsibilities as Americans—actively participating in the political process to ensure that our voice is heard and that our rights are protected.
In examining the current political landscape, a pressing question arises: why do people feel impotent in effecting real change within the federal government? The answer lies in the nature of the government itself. The corporate United States created in 1871 operates not as a representative entity of the people but as a corporate body that manages the people. This distinction is vital; a corporation is inherently designed to serve its stakeholders and interests at the expense of the general public. Consequently, when Americans seek to enact change through this corporate structure, they encounter significant barriers. These barriers stem from the fact that the corporation does not prioritize individual representation or governance; instead, it operates under a model that emphasizes control and management. This realization prompts us to reevaluate how we engage with our government and seek alternatives that align more closely with principles of liberty.
One of the fundamental principles of law is the concept of de jure versus de facto governance. When a de jure government asserts itself, it is recognized as the legitimate authority, rendering any de facto systems ineffective. This principle exhorts that when the rightful government is in place, it can effectively represent the will of the people. In 2010, the republic re-established a de jure government, the Republic for the United States of America. This movement reflects a growing awareness among the people that they must actively participate in the political process to restore the republic. By coming together to re-inhabit this structure, Americans are not merely reacting to grievances but are instead taking proactive steps to ensure that their governance is aligned with their values and needs according to the original constitution.
Reflecting on the historical context of our governance, we must consider the implications of the Civil War and its aftermath. While the Union was preserved, the fate of the republic was less certain. Following the conflict, significant changes occurred within the legislative framework, particularly around 1871 when Congress began passing laws that were unlawful. This period marked a pivotal shift in governance, leading to the establishment of a corporate entity in Washington, D.C. This corporate model not only altered the nature of governance but also laid the groundwork for a system that prioritized corporate interests over those of the people. As individuals and communities grappled with the consequences of these changes, it became increasingly clear that a re-examination of our government’s structure and purpose was necessary to ensure that the ideals of the republic were preserved and upheld.
In light of these observations, it is essential for the American people to recognize their role in shaping the future of governance. The understanding that the people are the ultimate authority within their states should inspire a renewed commitment to civic participation and activism. It is imperative that we challenge the corporate governance model that has taken root and get involved in the restored republic, the Republic for the United States of America, that genuinely represents the interests of the people. By coming together and asserting our rights as sovereign individuals, we can reclaim our liberty and work towards a government that is reflective of our values and responsive to our needs. This is not merely a call to action; it is an invitation to engage in the ongoing dialogue about our governance and to take the necessary steps to ensure that our republic remains vibrant and true to its founding principles.