Jun 3, 2024 15:09:45 EST
Q !!120613817 ID: 177645 No. 7728-6732-7038-060324 đź”—
#100 Unveiling The Deep State: The Untold Story of Russian Collusion - Unveiling the Uranium One Scandal and the Clinton Connection
At this pivotal moment in time, America finds itself entrenched within a crisis of unprecedented magnitude, one surpassing the gravity of even the tumultuous period of 1776. This isn't merely a crisis; it's a confluence of conflicts. At its core lies an exhaustive information war, but paramount to that, a spiritual battle for the essence of America and the very souls of its people, reminiscent of biblical proportions. The annals of the last fifteen decades bear witness to an insidious proliferation of corruption, tyranny, and moral decay within the fabric of America. The magnitude of malevolence, treachery, sedition, and blatant disregard for the sanctity of human rights, freedom, and liberty, orchestrated by a cabal of global elites driven by insatiable greed and thirst for power, is nothing short of abhorrent. We find ourselves navigating through a juncture in time where the imperative for every American, every patriot, to rise in defiance, to safeguard our liberties and resist the encroaching tyranny lest they slip through our fingers forever. Letters To America serves as a beacon of truth amidst the pervasive fog of deception, illuminating the shadows of deceit that have enveloped our government for generations, empowering you to discern the truth amidst the pervasive darkness of corruption and manipulation, offering insights into the entrenched evils and pervasive corruption that have ensnared our government and compromised the very essence of America, all for the pursuit of personal gain.
Letters to America is a very detailed collection of intel and information based on the truth that the American people need to know about that has been hidden in the shadows and suppressed for far too long. Letters to America is not just a compilation of facts and data; it embodies a profound commitment to unveiling the concealed realities that the American public deserves to be aware of, truths obscured in the obscure corners and silenced by the mainstream media [FAKE NEWS] outlets. It is a repository of untold stories and hidden narratives and agendas, shunned and suppressed by the behemoth of big tech platforms, including the likes of Facebook. The driving force behind Letters to America is singular and unwavering: the dissemination of unfiltered, unvarnished truth to the people of this great nation. Its mission is to empower individuals to awaken to the veracity that surrounds them, to be informed people, capable of making choices and decisions rooted in the bedrock of truth rather than the quicksand of misinformation, lies and deceit. With depth, integrity, character, and purpose, Letters to America aspires to be the torchbearer of honesty in an era where the clarity of truth is often overshadowed by obscurity.
In today's Letter to America, like always, we embark on a profound journey into the depths of our collective consciousness, where uncomfortable truths reside that are waiting to be acknowledged and confronted. As we navigate the tumultuous waters of our world, it becomes clearly evident that our awareness, or lack thereof, profoundly shapes our understanding of the narratives that unfold before us. The revelations that are chronicled within this letter unveil hidden truths that will challenge preconceived notions, test the boundaries of our beliefs, and ultimately, illuminate the path towards a more enlightened existence. It is in our capacity and our willingness to explore these unsettling truths, to engage with them authentically, and to foster a deeper sense of integrity that will pave the way for a nation that transcends division and seeks the profound unity that binds us all as Americans.
Your level of awakening and consciousness serves as a lens through which the intricate layers of meaning within today's letter unfold, revealing the profound wisdom and insight chronicled within its words. As you delve deeper into the text, your heightened awareness allows you to grasp the subtle nuances and hidden truths hidden between the lines, enriching your understanding of the message and the world around you.
-
The underlying truth in the “Russian collusion” case starts with Uranium One, a company which former president Bill Clinton helped establish along with Frank Giustra, a Canadian entrepreneur. In 2004-2005, both Giustra and Clinton saw an opportunity to win the uranium market in Kazakhstan. The story ends with the receipt of a $500,000 payment for a speech given by Bill Clinton in Moscow. This speaking fee was paid for by a company called Renaissance Capital, which has close ties to Vladimir Putin and former Russian intelligence officers.
This letter seeks to show that, although US investigators have not found evidence of Russian collusion with the 2016 presidential election, there is plenty of actual evidence that Democrats have been involved in their own forms of Russian collusion. Even so, the Deep State controls the mainstream media—this is a narrative that we will never see. Both the Clintons and the Democrats have continued to avoid scrutiny, while Special Counselor Mueller continues to investigate leaks. It’s easy to connect the dots and see that the ultimate end-goal is to hold President Trump against criminal charges.
Uranium One began in 2004 as UrAsia Energy Ltd. by Frank Giustra. In 2005, Bill Clinton and Frank Giustra met in Kazakhstan in, reportedly, what was a chance encounter.
Clinton’s stated goal was to introduce a Clinton Foundation initiative to provide low-cost medication for HIV patients. However, at that time, Kazakhstan had only 1,500 reported cases of HIV, and the generic drugs provided by the Clinton foundation were ultimately found to be ineffective. Of course, it’s worth mentioning that Kazakhstan has approximately 12 percent of the entire globe’s uranium. As mining capabilities expanded, Kazakhstan became the world leader in uranium production. In 2015-2016, they produced as much as 39 percent of the entire market.
Although UrAsia was a fledgling start-up at the time, Giustra managed to talk the ruling despot (Nursultan Nazarbayev) into giving the company a uranium deal. Since then, it has been revealed by leading officials in Kazatomprom, the governmental agency that manages the country’s uranium and nuclear energy, that Hillary Clinton had a hand in this deal, pressuring Kazakh officials to give UrAsia the uranium rights.
As reported by the New York Times, when the contract with Kazakhstan was final, Giustra donated over $31 million to assist the Clinton Foundation with their battle against HIV/AIDS. This remained a secret until 2008, and reportedly established a spot among the Clinton’s inner circle.
What this ultimately suggests is that the arrival of Bill Clinton and Frank Giustra in Kazakhstan was anything but a coincidence.
The fact that Kazakhstan gave Bill Clinton and Frank Giustra the uranium contract was a moment that, arguably, Russia was less than happy with. Moukhtar Dzhakishev, president of local governmental agency Kazatomprom, was arrested by Russia in 2009 on counts of stealing uranium, embezzling shares in mines, money laundering, and taking bribes. This earned him a 14-year prison sentence. Although Dzhakishev transformed the agency into a global power, he had allowed Clinton and Giustra to take the uranium mines that Putin wanted for himself.
Ultimately, Putin decided to have Rosatom, an energy company controlled by the Russian government, acquire Uranium One. To eventually bribe the Clintons to let Uranium One be acquired, he began with creating an espionage operation in the United States. First, as a subsidiary of Rosatom, the trucking company Tenex was already in operation through Tenam USA throughout Bethesda, Maryland. Tenem USA was headed by Vadim Mikerin, a Russian official working within Rosatom.
While solidifying contracts for US-based companies to purchase uranium from Russia, Mikerin defrauded them into paying inflated prices, with excess income filtered through secret bank accounts (Latvia, Cyprus, Switzerland, and the Seychelles Islands) and shell companies. Not only did these inflated payments put more money into the pockets of Kremlin officials throughout the US and Russia, but they also left US-based companies vulnerable to blackmail by Russia.
A second part of this plan to acquire Uranium One came through Mikerin hiring a Russian associate as a consultant (who was, incidentally, connected to organized crime groups in Russia). Upon discovering that Mikerin was extorting US-based companies, he exposed the scheme to the FBI. Rather than be held to legal prosecution, this consultant was instead hired as a confidential source of racketeering evidence.
The investigation by the FBI into this extortion and bribery was headquartered in Maryland, and then FBI director Robert Mueller assigned control to the then US attorney in Maryland, Rod J. Rosenstein. (Years later, the tables would turn as Rosenstein would appoint Robert Mueller as the special counselor who would investigate Trump.)
The FBI—along with CS-1 assistance—intercepted emails and secretly recorded evidence to show that Tenam violated the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act through bribes and kickbacks. At the same time, millions of dollars were routed to the US by Russian nuclear officials for the Clinton Foundation. Interestingly, this also occurred while Secretary Hillary Clinton was on the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS).
CFIUS operates from the Treasury as an interagency committee. Their vote would be the deciding one to allow Rosatom to acquire Uranium One. Although the FBI had been investigating Tenam USA and the Russian spy network since 2009, CFIUS was never given this information when they voted on the acquisition in 2010 and 2013.
Both Rosenstein and Mueller played a role in keeping the Russian bribery scheme quiet— which should be more than enough evidence to disqualify the investigation into President Trump. Both men knew that CFIUS would not have allowed Rosatom to purchase Uranium One if there had been full, public disclosure of the Russian bribery and extortion. Should an investigation be opened into Uranium One, Mueller would surely face significant pressure to abandon his post as a special counselor within the Russian collusion investigation.
Again, this instance demonstrates how both Rosenstein and Mueller play a role within the Deep State. There is a long list of instances in which Lynch, Comey, Mueller, and Holder have all conspired to end investigations that carried potential for criminal charges against Bill Clinton, Hillary Clinton, and even Barack Obama. The impact of DOJ corruption could clearly be heard at every turn in the Trump campaign, with posters and shouts of “Drain the swamp!” and “Lock her up!”
WikiLeaks released a State Department memo from June of 2009, confirming that Uranium One purchased 50 percent of a Kazakhstan uranium holding corporation. The state nuclear company, Kazatomprom, held ownership of the other half. CFIUS voted to allow Rosatom to acquire 51 percent of Uranium One in October of 2010 (recall that Secretary Hillary Clinton and Attorney Eric Holder were both committee members at the time). Clinton says she was not involved and did not vote—but according to the records, she was in contact with the State Department representative who gave her proxy vote. In exchange for a position on the Center for American Progress (owned by John Podesta), Fernandez promised to be loyal to Clinton.
Rosatom acquired Uranium One in its entirety in 2013 through a subsidiary called ARMZ Uranium Holding. Just as before, CFIUS approved the deal through a vote, essentially giving Russia the blessing of US government to manage one-fifth of all US uranium production. A New York Times article reported that investors in Uranium One and UrAsia donated over $8 million to the Clinton Foundation. By 2013, when the Russians had complete ownership of Uranium One, company shareholders had contributed a reported $145 million.
During 2010-2013, then FBI director Robert Mueller did not investigate the payments made to the Clinton Foundation. By all appearances, if Secretary Hillary Clinton allowed CFIUS approval of Uranium One’s acquisition by Russian-owned corporation Rosatom, those millions of dollars in donations continued to ebb in.
A crucial caveat used by the Clintons is that the deal with Uranium One had been the subject of multiple investigations—and that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) prohibited the company from shipping any uranium from the US overseas.
Investigative reporters John Solomon and Alison Spann published a story in November 2017 that revealed NRC memos. Published in the Hill, these memos proved that the NRC had actually approved shipment of yellowcake uranium (used to create nuclear fuel and weapons) from US-based, Russian-owned mines into Canada. Some of that uranium was shipped to Europe under the Obama administration’s approval. Read Article 1 Here. Read Article 2 Here.
Although the NRC claims that these shipments were limited to the years between 2012- 2014, the commission certainly amended an existing import license to RSB Logistics Services Inc. Based out of Kentucky, this trucking firm added Uranium One to the list of clients that were approved for goods transfer into Canada. This amendment was kept hidden from Congress, sparking questions on whether third-party arrangements through the Russian bribery scheme may have circumvented the safety reassurances by the NRC. With CIFUS allowing Rosatom to acquire complete control over Uranium One, Putin not only gained back the Kazakhstan uranium rights, but also the ability to transport production overseas. In court and in interviews, the FBI claimed that they had enough evidence by 2010 to prove that officials within Rosatom (or connected to it) were engaged in a worldwide bribery, kickbacks, and money laundering scheme.
Deputy Attorney General Rod J. Rosenstein appointed Robert Mueller as the special counsel in the Russian collusion investigation in May 2017. On that very same day, Julian Assange referenced a 2009 State Department cable (released by WikiLeaks) that demonstrated Hillary Clinton had ordered Mueller to deliver a stolen sample of highly enriched uranium (HEU) to Russia.
The reasons behind this secretive transfer of uranium are unclear. There are other WikiLeaks cables that show that Uranium One transactions with Kazakhstan have been recorded since as far back as 2008.
Although Clinton supporters insist that this secretive mission to Russia was not connected to Uranium One—or the position held by Hillary Clinton in CFIUS—there are plenty of reasons to conduct an extensive investigation. (Perhaps the biggest is that the CFIUS votes gave Putin a 20 percent share in all of America’s uranium.) Evidence suggests that Mueller ignored Uranium One transactions that were suspicious at best, and potentially criminal at worst.
As reported by the Associated Press, the uranium sample was weapons grade, but too small to accurately pinpoint its origin. These reports were published by RIA-Novosti and ITAR-Tass, two Russian news outlets.
Since Russia already had samples of the stolen HEU in 2006, there doesn’t seem to be much sense in Robert Mueller participating in a secretive, tarmac mission to bring a US sample to Moscow. The meaning of that secret trip to Russia—and Hillary’s intention—has never been revealed.
-
A LETTER FROM SENATOR CHARLES E. GRASSLEY TO REX W. TILLERSON
This is the letter from Senator Charles E. Grassley, Chairman of the Committee on the Judiciary to then United States Secretary, Rex W. Tillerson.
October 12, 2017
The Honorable Rex W. Tillerson
Secretary
U.S. Department of State
Washington, D.C. 20520
Dear Secretary Tillerson:
In June 2015, I wrote to several member agencies on the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS) regarding the acquisition of Uranium One, an owner of U.S. based uranium assets, by Atomredmetzoloto (ARMZ), which is a subsidiary of Russia’s state energy corporation, Rosatom.1 The transaction raised a number of national security concerns because it effectively ceded twenty percent of U.S. uranium production capacity to the Russian government.
In that letter, I raised additional concerns related to potential conflicts of interest between the State Department and the transacting parties. These concerns stemmed from the fact that during critical stages of the acquisition approval, interested parties, such as the Chairman of Uranium One, Ian Telfer, made large donations—some in the millions of dollars—to the Clinton Foundation while Hillary Clinton was Secretary of State.
In response to my inquiry, the Obama administration wrote that in October 2010, CFIUS certified to Congress that “there [were] no unresolved national security concerns with the transaction” and that the transaction had been approved.4 Further, the U.S. Treasury’s response noted that “[n]o CFIUS agency proposed mitigation or prohibition of the transaction.”
I am not convinced by these assurances. The sale of Uranium One resulted in a Russian government takeover of a significant portion of U.S. uranium mining capacity. In light of that fact, very serious questions remain about the basis for the finding that this transaction did not threaten to impair U.S. national security.
In addition, it has recently come to the Committee’s attention that employees of Rosatom were involved in a criminal enterprise involving a conspiracy to commit extortion and money laundering during the time of the CFIUS transaction. According to court filings in the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, in 2009, the FBI began an investigation into corruption and extortion by senior managers of JSC Techsnabexport (Tenex), a subsidiary of Rosatom. Tenex operated as the sole supplier and exporter of Russian Federation uranium and uranium enrichment services to nuclear power companies worldwide. Tenex established a wholly-owned subsidiary company located in the United States called Tenam, which became Tenex’s official representative in the United States. Tenex was run by Vadim Mikerin, a Russian national and Director of the Pan American Department of Tenex from 2004 to 2010. In 2010, Mikerin became the executive director of Tenam until 2014. As director of Tenam, he oversaw the shipment of uranium from Russia for use in American power plants under the “Megatons to Megawatts” program. It has been reported that at one point the program fueled ten percent of U.S. electricity.
According to the facts set forth by the federal government, between 2004 and 2014, Mr. Mikerin was involved in a multimillion dollar conspiracy involving an extortion and money laundering scheme that awarded contracts to American companies to transport uranium in exchange for kick-backs. In 2014, Mr. Mikerin pleaded guilty “to helping orchestrate more than $2 million in bribe payments through a web of secret accounts in Cyprus, Latvia, and Switzerland.” His actions, according to the government, occurred “with the consent of higher level officials at Tenex and Rosatom…” Indeed, based on news reports, the investigation began as an intelligence probe into Russian nuclear officials. During the investigation, federal agents attempted to convince Mr. Mikerin to turn on his Russian colleagues by showing him evidence of relationships between “shell companies and other Russian energy officials, including President Vladimir Putin.” He refused to expose them and was subsequently arrested and charged. It is unclear whether these criminal actors and actions factored into CFIUS’ review of the Rosatom transaction and, if so, whether it brought additional scrutiny.
The Committee has also learned additional details regarding a June 2010 speech in Moscow where former President Bill Clinton, and thereby Secretary Clinton, received $500,000 from Renaissance Capital, a Russian investment bank whose senior officers include former FSB (Russian intelligence) personnel. Most of the banks in Russia are controlled in some manner by the Kremlin, and sources have described Renaissance Capital as an extension of the Russian government. At the Committee’s recent oversight hearing on the Foreign Agents Registration Act, a witness described Renaissance Bank in the following way:
The Chairman was – or I should say another senior official was a British citizen of Russian origin named Igor Sagiryan. On their staff at Renaissance Capital, they trumpeted the fact that they had a number of former FSB officers on their staff. I should point out that there is no such thing as a former FSB officer. It is a lifetime commitment. And in the Department of Justice investigation into Prevezon Holdings, they determined that $13 million from the crime that Sergei Magnitsky uncovered, exposed, and was killed over went to the bank accounts of Renaissance Capital in the United Kingdom.
Notably, in the same month as the Clinton speech, Uranium One and Rosatom notified CFIUS of the Russian government’s intent to acquire twenty percent of the United States’ uranium assets. The next month, in July 2010, Renaissance Bank reportedly assigned Uranium One a “buy” rating, a move that would principally benefit its Russian investors.
The donations raise concerns about potential conflicts of interest for Secretary Clinton and the Obama administration. The fact that Rosatom subsidiaries in the United States were under criminal investigation as a result of a U.S. intelligence operation apparently around the time CFIUS approved the Uranium One/Rosatom transaction raises questions about whether that information factored into CFIUS’ decision to approve the transaction.
In order to assess the decisions concerning the sale of Uranium One, please answer the following questions:
1. According to the Treasury Department, CFIUS gathers on a weekly basis to discuss pending transactions. Please list the date of each meeting that involved a discussion of the Uranium One/Rosatom transaction, the list of attendees by agency, and provide all records related to each meeting to include all transcripts, memoranda, and other communications regarding the transaction.
2. Were your agency’s personnel assigned to the CFIUS transaction made aware of the ongoing criminal and intelligence investigation into senior managers of Tenex, Tenam, and Rosatom prior to CFIUS approval of the Uranium One transaction in October 2010? If so, please detail when they were made aware and what exactly they were made aware of. In addition, please provide all records relating to those communications. If not, why not?
3. Please provide a copy of all records related to the presentation provided by Uranium One/Rosatom to CFIUS staffers prior to filing a formal notice on August 4, 2010.
4. Please provide a copy of your agency’s official confirmation to Treasury that the transaction did not raise any unresolved national security concerns.
5. Please provide all records relating to your agency’s determination that the Uranium One/Rosatom transaction did not raise any unresolved national security concerns.
6. Please provide all records relating to communications with respect to Secretary Clinton and donations to the Clinton Foundation by parties interested in the Uranium One/Rosatom transaction.
I anticipate that your written response and most responsive documents will be unclassified. Please send all unclassified material directly to the Committee. In keeping with the requirements of Executive Order 13526, if any of the responsive documents do contain classified information, please segregate all unclassified material within the classified documents, provide all unclassified information directly to the Committee, and provide a classified addendum to the Office of Senate Security. The Committee complies with all laws and regulations governing the handling of classified information. The Committee is not bound, absent its prior agreement, by any handling restrictions or instructions on unclassified information unilaterally asserted by the Executive Branch.
Thank you in advance for your cooperation with this request. Please respond no later than October 26, 2017. If you have questions, contact Josh Flynn-Brown of my Committee staff at (202) 224-5225.
Sincerely,
Charles E. Grassley
Chairman
Committee on the Judiciary
-
YES, THE RUSSIA SCANDAL IS REAL — AND IT INVOLVES HILLARY CLINTON
Clinton Scandals: For well over a year now, the progressive left in the Democratic Party have tried hard to sell the idea that, a) Russia meddled in our election, and, b) that it was to the detriment of Hillary Clinton. After nearly a year and a half of investigating, neither appears true. What is true, and now documented, is that Hillary Clinton and her family foundation both benefited handsomely from Russian corruption.
Citing federal officials and government documents, The Hill details the Russians' nuclear-industry corruption here in the U.S., citing extensive evidence that "Russian nuclear industry officials were engaged in bribery, kickbacks, extortion and money laundering designed to grow Vladimir Putin's atomic energy business" in the U.S.
But that's just the beginning. Based on both an eyewitness account and documents, The Hill report goes on to say that federal agents found evidence "indicating Russian nuclear officials had routed millions of dollars to the U.S. designed to benefit former President Bill Clinton's charitable foundation during the time Secretary of State Hillary Clinton served on a government body that provided a favorable decision to Moscow."
Isn't that called bribery?
Strangely, the Department of Justice first discovered the Russian racketeering scheme and the links to Clinton in 2009. But it failed to bring charges, and dragged its investigation out for four years with no substantive action.
Meanwhile, in October of 2010, the State Department and the interagency Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS) curiously — and unanimously — approved the sale of part of Uranium One, a Canadian-based company with uranium interests in the U.S., to Rosatom, a Russian state holding company.
Why is this significant? That sale gave Russia, a potential nuclear foe, defacto control over 20% of the U.S.' uranium supply. Let that sink in for a minute.
Then there's this: The CFIUS that approved the Rosatom deal had two key members: Then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, who in a clear conflict of interest materially benefited from the deal, and Attorney General Eric Holder, the man responsible for slow-walking the investigation into Russian nuclear racketeering.
So the Obama administration knew of the Russian racketeering, extortion, money laundering, and the rest, as Vladimir Putin's minions elbowed their way into the U.S. nuclear market. The Obama administration did nothing. The administration knew, too, that Hillary was selling access and influence in the State Department via donations to the family charity. But, again, it did nothing.
And these donations weren't just peanuts.
The Clintons and their foundation raked in a cool $145 million in donations and "speaking fees" just from Uranium One- and Rosatom-affiliated donors while Secretary of State Hillary Clinton was supposedly keeping all Clinton Foundation business at "arm's-length." As we reported in July, Clinton official emails show extensive connections between Hillary, the Clinton Foundation and donors during her time as secretary of state, a kind of criminal conga-line of people asking for favors from Hillary and donating to the foundation.
Peter Schwiezer, the author of "Clinton Cash," questioned this "spontaneous outbreak of philanthropy among eight shareholders in Uranium One" who "decide now would be a great time to donate tens of millions of dollars to the Clinton Foundation."
Nor was this just a Russian thing. It was a much-broader pay-for-play scheme by Hillary Clinton. Consider this: Of the 154 private interests that were given official access to Hillary Clinton during her tenure at the State Department, at least 85 donated to the Clinton Foundation or a program affiliated with it. The secretary of state's office in Foggy Bottom might as well have had "For Sale" painted on it.
That the Clintons and their eponymous foundation got away with their corrupt arrangement for so many years without interference or censure speaks to a deep political corruption in the Obama administration. It's strange that an investigation continues into the inconsequential ties between the Donald Trump campaign and Russian officials, while solid evidence of bribery of the Clinton family by the Russians and many others is completely ignored.
-
A NEW YORK TIMES ARTICLE FROM APRIL 23, 2015
Cash Flowed to Clinton Foundation Amid Russian Uranium Deal
https://americanpatriotsocial.com/documents/Cash-Flowed-to-Clinton-Foundation-Amid-Russian-Uranium-Deal.pdf
-
The Untold Story of the Clintons, Uranium, and Corruption
https://americanpatriotsocial.com/documents/The-Untold-Story-of-the-Clintons-Uranium-and-Corruption.pdf
-
Judicial Watch Sues For Records On Uranium One Deal OKed By Hillary Clinton
https://americanpatriotsocial.com/documents/Judicial-Watch-Sues-For-Records-On-Uranium-One-Deal-OKed-By-Hillary-Clinton.pdf
Qx