Jun 15, 2024 15:38:47 EST
Q !!120613817 ID: 177645 No. 7284-7656-7848-061524 đź”—
#102 Unveiling The Deep State: How The Deep State Used FAKE NEWS and Media Matters Funded By George Soros To Push a Socialist Agenda and Silence Conservative Voices
At this pivotal moment in time, America finds itself entrenched within a crisis of unprecedented magnitude, one surpassing the gravity of even the tumultuous period of 1776. This isn't merely a crisis; it's a confluence of conflicts. At its core lies an exhaustive information war, but paramount to that, a spiritual battle for the essence of America and the very souls of its people, reminiscent of biblical proportions. The annals of the last fifteen decades bear witness to an insidious proliferation of corruption, tyranny, and moral decay within the fabric of America. The magnitude of malevolence, treachery, sedition, and blatant disregard for the sanctity of human rights, freedom, and liberty, orchestrated by a cabal of global elites driven by insatiable greed and thirst for power, is nothing short of abhorrent. We find ourselves navigating through a juncture in time where the imperative for every American, every patriot, to rise in defiance, to safeguard our liberties and resist the encroaching tyranny lest they slip through our fingers forever. Letters To America serves as a beacon of truth amidst the pervasive fog of deception, illuminating the shadows of deceit that have enveloped our government for generations, empowering you to discern the truth amidst the pervasive darkness of corruption and manipulation, offering insights into the entrenched evils and pervasive corruption that have ensnared our government and compromised the very essence of America, all for the pursuit of personal gain.
Letters to America is a very detailed collection of intel and information based on the truth that the American people need to know about that has been hidden in the shadows and suppressed for far too long. Letters to America is not just a compilation of facts and data; it embodies a profound commitment to unveiling the concealed realities that the American public deserves to be aware of, truths obscured in the obscure corners and silenced by the mainstream media [FAKE NEWS] outlets. It is a repository of untold stories and hidden narratives and agendas, shunned and suppressed by the behemoth of big tech platforms, including the likes of Facebook. The driving force behind Letters to America is singular and unwavering: the dissemination of unfiltered, unvarnished truth to the people of this great nation. Its mission is to empower individuals to awaken to the veracity that surrounds them, to be informed people, capable of making choices and decisions rooted in the bedrock of truth rather than the quicksand of misinformation, lies and deceit. With depth, integrity, character, and purpose, Letters to America aspires to be the torchbearer of honesty in an era where the clarity of truth is often overshadowed by obscurity.
In today's Letter to America, like always, we embark on a profound journey into the depths of our collective consciousness, where uncomfortable truths reside that are waiting to be acknowledged and confronted. As we navigate the tumultuous waters of our world, it becomes clearly evident that our awareness, or lack thereof, profoundly shapes our understanding of the narratives that unfold before us. The revelations that are chronicled within this letter unveil hidden truths that will challenge preconceived notions, test the boundaries of our beliefs, and ultimately, illuminate the path towards a more enlightened existence. It is in our capacity and our willingness to explore these unsettling truths, to engage with them authentically, and to foster a deeper sense of integrity that will pave the way for a nation that transcends division and seeks the profound unity that binds us all as Americans.
Your level of awakening and consciousness serves as a lens through which the intricate layers of meaning within today's letter unfold, revealing the profound wisdom and insight chronicled within its words. As you delve deeper into the text, your heightened awareness allows you to grasp the subtle nuances and hidden truths hidden between the lines, enriching your understanding of the message and the world around you.
-
The manipulation of mainstream media by the hard left shows a demonstrated favoritism to massive, overreaching government regulation, including culture, economy, and trade. Both the Deep State and the extreme left share this purview, hoping to create a global and governmental “handout” state, controlling its people from their first breath to their last.
The New York Times, the Washington Post, and the Wall Street Journal all have editors who support socialist policies so commonly promoted by the Democratic Party for decades. Since the 1960s—and perhaps even the Depression, in the 1930s—these views have included free trade agreements and lax immigration policies, including open borders.
Recently, experienced members of the political hard left have adopted a new goal, along with the help of massive funding from foundations, millionaires, and billionaires. Along with a biased viewing of the news, these hard-leftists political members are trying to discredit conservative and libertarian members as extremists or conspiracy theorists. The end-goal—of which we are in the final stages—will be a state that does not tolerate disagreement or religious freedom. Instead, this totalitarian state believes first and foremost in political correctness, particularly when it comes to identity and LGBT issues.
An example of this one-sided state of being comes from Media Matters, an organization ran by David Brock. As an advocate for LGBT issues, Brock (formerly conservative) is now on the hard left, and seeks to eliminate conservative and libertarian voices in all media forms, primarily social media and blogs. Media Matters—and groups like it—want to ensure that conservative and libertarian points of view are not only ignored, but that they are discredited.
Once Trump was announced as the winner of the presidential election, Brock announced that Media Matters would be the leader in a movement to defy his presidential rule. Today, Brock aims to provoke, organize, and ultimately weaponize the liberal bias in the media and local communities. His stance is poised to completely eliminate both libertarians and conservatives from the US.
In 2017, David Brock published a briefing book to attract donors for his “Media Matters for America 2020 Plan.” This book details what he believes to be the inherent challenges of the right-wing and their well-funded media outlets. In it, he also states that his core mission is to tear down what he calls “conservative disinformation.”
He was one of the first to link the terms “conservative disinformation” and “fake news” together to try and create an ongoing narrative against media, reporters, and pundits with conservative views.
Brock attacks the Media Research Center for using their $18 million annual budget to push what he calls “disinformation” and an ongoing myth about a national media that is liberally biased. Breitbart is criticized in a similar fashion for receiving funding from billionaires connected to the Trump administration. In these sections, he creates and uses the term “alt-right” to attack conservatives and as a synonymous descriptor for white nationalism, misogyny, and anti-Semitism.
Because of Brock and his use of “alt-right,” the narrative is now becoming that any conservative figure in the media that does not adhere to a Democratic point of view on current events is suddenly seen as an anti-Semite, a white nationalist, or a misogynist. Based on Brock’s actions, there is zero doubt that Facebook and Google are allies in promoting the false narrative of “fake news ” and “misinformation,” ultimately attacking conservative and libertarian views online.
According to his briefing book, Media Matters aims to accomplish the following throughout Trump’s presidency:
• Recurring propagandists and mis-informers in social media and high government positions are going to be exposed.
• Platforms like Facebook and Google (along with other social media and internet outlets) will not support, endorse, or host fake news sites.
• Campaigns of harassment (often propelled through social media) from the alt- right will be stopped and silenced.
Less than a week after the election, Google announced that they would begin banning websites from their online advertising service as a punishment for promoting “fake news.” On that same day, Facebook altered its Audience Network policy to say that their ads would not be shown on fake news sites (along with sites that show misleading or legal content).
In 2017, Google reported that 200 publishers had been removed from AdSense after the new policy took effect. While Brock states that Google took a significant amount of time and effort, he is also quick to say that Mark Zuckerberg (Facebook) was difficult to convince.
As a result, Media Matters pressured Facebook to acknowledge that fake news is an issue, that it has dire consequences, and that action must be taken. Their campaign was successful, and Media Matters got both of their requests granted.
George Soros was among the first to employ economic power in order to push libertarian and conservative figures out of the news stream. Hacked documents (2,500 of them, to be exact) from his Open Society Foundation prove that the organization was funding campaigns against Glenn Beck (Fox News), Pat Buchanan (MSNBC), and Lou Dobbs (CNN).
Soros (through his Democracy Fund and its head, Bill Vandenberg) funded a $600,000 grant to Color of Change in the hopes that the organization would help to keep media companies accountable for their actions. Color of Change is a progressive nonprofit that advocates for African American issues, and has over a million members. According to their website, Color of Change defines themselves as working to “move decision-makers in corporations and government to create a more human and less hostile world for Black people in America.”
In a 2012 memo announcing the Color of Change grant, Vandenberg revealed what many conservatives and libertarians already knew—that Soros was actively funding leftist activists to launch campaigns against long-standing cable news figures like Beck, Buchanan, and Dobbs.
When Glenn Beck was fired from Fox News, the liberal media reported that his firing was due to an aggressive campaign, resulting in losing nearly 400 of advertisers. Perhaps not surprisingly, missing from this report was the fact that Soros was funding an organized campaign against Beck. According to Bill Meyers, PBS host, Fox News fired Beck because he refused to stop criticizing and going after Soros during his show.
In 2012, MSNBC decided to separate from Pat Buchanan after working together for a decade, supposedly due to contention over his book, Suicide of a Superpower: Will America Survive to 2025?
The American Conservative published a piece called “Blacklisted, but Not Beaten” in which Buchanan confirmed that Color of Change was pushing for his departure almost immediately after Suicide of a Superpower was published. Of particular contention was the fourth chapter, titled “The End of White America,” which was highlighted by Color of Change as an example of white supremacy. According to Buchanan, his defense is that: “America is Balkanizing, breaking down along the lines of religion, race, ethnicity, culture, and ideology and that Western peoples are facing demographic death by century’s end.” Buchanan also goes on to bemoan his lack of free speech, pointing to Color of Change for policing his opinion and labeling him as a racist in order to silence him.
In a statement released by Color of Change, the nonprofit described the removal of Glenn Beck from Fox News as a success in their attempts to hold media outlets accountable for racist or toxic information. They also said that the decision to remove Beck from the television was made in 2008 after an off-air comment from Beck was released, calling President Obama a racist who hates white people.
The Color of Change campaign against Beck involved sending petitions with over 285,000 signatures to some of his largest advertisers, such as Sprint, CVS, Best Buy, and Walmart. These petitions stated that continued funding of Beck and his show was synonymous with racism and divisiveness. Media Matters was brought in to help with the campaign, including MoveOn, Jewish Funds for Justice, and CREDO Action. When petitions were initially unsuccessful, Color of Change members took to social media and phone calls to get their message across.
By funding various Hispanic advocacy groups, Soros is largely credited in pushing CNN to cancel Lou Dobbs Tonight, an hour-long program featuring Lou Dobbs. This can be seen in an Open Society Foundation summary of the Democracy and Power Fund from 2011-2012, including groups like Citizen Engagement Lab, Presenté, New Organizing Institute, and Voto Latino.
When Dobbs announced that he was leaving CNN, the founder of Presenté, Roberto Lovato, issued a statement applauding his departure, accusing Dobbs of “spreading lies and conspiracy theories about immigrants and Latinos.”
Amidst sexual harassment and misconduct charges against Bill O’Reilly, Media Matters arranged a sponsorship boycott similar to the campaign against Glenn Beck. The mainstream media also played a role, reporting that 21st Century Fox (Fox News’s parent company) had paid five women approximately $13 million after they agreed not to seek litigation or speak about their accusations. Media Matters published a list of advertisers that had pulled their spots from The O’Reilly Factor, further exemplifying the economic impact of the campaign.
Along with these calculated campaigns against CNN, MSNBC, and Fox News—arguably, a campaign in itself against the 24/7 news cycle—the mainstream media is putting significant effort into breaking down Trump. News outlets maintain a nearly obsessive focus on criticizing each word, but rarely spend effort acknowledging accomplishments or positive events involving the White House
Indivisible is a grassroots partisan group that is dedicated to “do the work to stop Trump” and, in turn, save democracy. This involves using “lessons from the Tea Party’s rise,” creating local groups within the community and defensively targeting individual members of Congress who support Trump.
The group maintains an “Indivisible Guide” on their website, you can view the guide here, which is meant to teach activists how to use progressive techniques to disrupt, influence, manipulate, and—in many cases—harass members within the Senate and the House.
Available as a free download on their website, the Indivisible Guide calls Trump “the biggest popular-vote loser in history to ever call himself President,” going on to say: “We believe that protecting our values, our neighbors, and ourselves will require mounting a similar resistance to the Trump agenda — but a resistance built on the values of inclusion, tolerance, and fairness. Trump is not popular. He does not have a mandate. He does not have large congressional majorities. If a small minority in the Tea Party could stop President Obama, then we the majority can stop a petty tyrant named Trump.”
According to the guide, halting the Trump agenda involves occupying congressional offices, showing up at press events, attending local government meetings, and demanding answers on “questions about authoritarianism, and corruption.” For the Indivisible movement, the most pressing issues in their progressive agenda include “promoting “climate change awareness, economic justice, health care for all, racial equality, gender and sexual equality, and peace and human rights.”
As suggested by the Indivisible Guide, the best recruits for the movement come from those who will feel the most threatened by the Trump administration, which includes the LGBT community, women, immigrants, people of color, and those within the poor and working class. Diversity is encouraged, along with solidarity when making local, community-based groups. Local divisions often use “indivisible” when creating an official name, though they are welcome to create their own unique name, as long as their community roots are maintained.
Town meetings or other public political events are best attended by a group with a singular, agreed-upon message. No matter what, the goal of Indivisible is to send a powerful message that press coverage for their personal concerns will be unattainable until the concerns of the group are addressed.
Disruption by Indivisible can include a district office visit to a member of Congress, or a relentless stream of phone calls to tie up the lines and get a point across. The Guide states that the best way to protest an issue is to choose one that affects multiple members of the group, like addressing Medicare issues for seniors and caregivers, or protesting Muslim registries with Muslim members and their allies.
In its conclusion, the Indivisible Guide addresses a Democratic, politically correct, and inclusive millennial generation that is on the cusp of emergence into the political foray:
“We wrote this guide because we believe that the coming years will see an unprecedented movement of Americans rising up across the country to protect our values, our neighbors, and ourselves. Our goal is to provide practical understanding of how your Members of Congress (MoCs) think, and how you can demonstrate to them the depth and power of the opposition to Donald Trump and to Republican congressional overreach. This is not a panacea, and it is not intended to stand alone. We strongly urge you to marry the strategy in this guide with a broader commitment to creating a more just society, building local power, and addressing systemic injustice and racism.
While the organization denies that they are directly funded by George Soros, Capital Research Center has uncovered that at least three principals have past associations with organizations funded by Soros.
What Indivisible wanted to portray was that attendees of town halls and local meetings with Republican members of Congress were overthrown by angry, passionate advocates of Obamacare. However, according to a February 2017 tweet from Trump, these disruptions were actually planned by Indivisible, and were neither spontaneous nor genuine.
Rather than represent grassroots politics and the concerns of local voters, these organized events were staged and orchestrated. This has parallels to hecklers and anti-Trump individuals that attempted to stop rallies throughout the campaign, or Antifa trying to block members of the GOP from entering the Inaugural Ball. Attempts to interrupt town hall meetings held by Trump supporters within Congress include activists from leftist organizations across the spectrum, including supporters of Planned Parenthood, Black Lives Matter, and even union members of the Service Employees International Union (SEIU).
Qx